<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Yes<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> openlp-dev <openlp-dev-bounces@openlp.io> on behalf of openlp-dev-request@openlp.io <openlp-dev-request@openlp.io><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 11, 2018 4:48:33 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
<b>Subject:</b> openlp-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Send openlp-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
openlp-dev-request@openlp.io<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
openlp-dev-owner@openlp.io<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of openlp-dev digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Philip Ridout)<br>
2. Re: Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Samuel Mehrbrodt)<br>
3. Re: Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Daniel Borges)<br>
4. Re: Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Tim and Alison Bentley)<br>
5. Re: Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Jonathan Corwin)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:18:35 +0100<br>
From: Philip Ridout <phill.ridout@gmail.com><br>
To: OpenLP Developers <openlp-dev@openlp.io><br>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAG20JEBzfFswDEdvpPBj-buZMLjL-JShpzArVRPM+PSAoPFqBw@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Yes<br>
<br>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, 08:07 googol, <googol@posteo.de> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Okay with me<br>
><br>
> Am 10.10.18 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:<br>
> > Hi folks,<br>
> ><br>
> > We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian has<br>
> > been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not had an<br>
> > opportunity to actually spend some time on.<br>
> ><br>
> > One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit of<br>
> > OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found that<br>
> > while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5) are GPL3.<br>
> > Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been contemplating<br>
> > investigating it, but I've had other priorities.<br>
> ><br>
> > So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if<br>
> > we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version 3.<br>
> > Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to re-license, or<br>
> > a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thank you Bastian for your work!<br>
> ><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> openlp-dev mailing list<br>
> openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
> <a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/fb8893cc/attachment-0001.html">http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/fb8893cc/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:22:20 +0200<br>
From: Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com><br>
To: openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3<br>
Message-ID: <fd3a4385-6658-7ff1-7ef7-8a42792addc1@gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed<br>
<br>
I agree to re-license my contributions under GPLv3+.<br>
<br>
Samuel<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 10.10.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:<br>
> Hi folks,<br>
><br>
> We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian <br>
> has been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not <br>
> had an opportunity to actually spend some time on.<br>
><br>
> One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit <br>
> of OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found <br>
> that while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5) <br>
> are GPL3. Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been <br>
> contemplating investigating it, but I've had other priorities.<br>
><br>
> So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if <br>
> we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version <br>
> 3. Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to <br>
> re-license, or a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.<br>
><br>
> Thank you Bastian for your work!<br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:58:20 -0300<br>
From: Daniel Borges <danielborges93@gmail.com><br>
To: OpenLP <openlp-dev@openlp.io><br>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAGyMjBEtYwGkTJmpLaCorXqLXVZ4RSXVuRwp3qKZSp5_OSYfcQ@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Ok for me ;-)<br>
<br>
What about iOS Remote client? We should re-license to GPL3? Currently we<br>
use MIT license.<br>
<br>
Em qui, 11 de out de 2018 às 04:22, Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com><br>
escreveu:<br>
<br>
> I agree to re-license my contributions under GPLv3+.<br>
><br>
> Samuel<br>
><br>
><br>
> Am 10.10.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:<br>
> > Hi folks,<br>
> ><br>
> > We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian<br>
> > has been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not<br>
> > had an opportunity to actually spend some time on.<br>
> ><br>
> > One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit<br>
> > of OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found<br>
> > that while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5)<br>
> > are GPL3. Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been<br>
> > contemplating investigating it, but I've had other priorities.<br>
> ><br>
> > So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if<br>
> > we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version<br>
> > 3. Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to<br>
> > re-license, or a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.<br>
> ><br>
> > Thank you Bastian for your work!<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> openlp-dev mailing list<br>
> openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
> <a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
*Daniel Borges Ferreira da SilvaBacharel em Ciência da computação pela<br>
UFALMestre em Informática pela UFALMembro do Núcleo de Excelência em<br>
Tecnologias Sociais - NEES*<br>
<br>
<br>
*Desenvolvedor Back-end na Systemic BilingualLattes:<br>
<<a href="http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552">http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552</a>>http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552<br>
<<a href="http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552">http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552</a>>*<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/f6aeb18d/attachment-0001.html">http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/f6aeb18d/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:08:54 +0100<br>
From: Tim and Alison Bentley <Home@trarbentley.net><br>
To: Openlp Dev <openlp-dev@openlp.io><br>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAAT9HsjT=-=Ye2rO8oYx2pRsjky9UBu9iW-bkGeGKCOUETGbKw@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Ios and Android will stay on MIT. This has been agreed with Raoul.<br>
<br>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, 13:58 Daniel Borges, <danielborges93@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Ok for me ;-)<br>
><br>
> What about iOS Remote client? We should re-license to GPL3? Currently we<br>
> use MIT license.<br>
><br>
> Em qui, 11 de out de 2018 às 04:22, Samuel Mehrbrodt <<br>
> s.mehrbrodt@gmail.com> escreveu:<br>
><br>
>> I agree to re-license my contributions under GPLv3+.<br>
>><br>
>> Samuel<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Am 10.10.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:<br>
>> > Hi folks,<br>
>> ><br>
>> > We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian<br>
>> > has been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not<br>
>> > had an opportunity to actually spend some time on.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit<br>
>> > of OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found<br>
>> > that while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5)<br>
>> > are GPL3. Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been<br>
>> > contemplating investigating it, but I've had other priorities.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if<br>
>> > we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version<br>
>> > 3. Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to<br>
>> > re-license, or a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Thank you Bastian for your work!<br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> openlp-dev mailing list<br>
>> openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
>> <a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> *Daniel Borges Ferreira da SilvaBacharel em Ciência da computação pela<br>
> UFALMestre em Informática pela UFALMembro do Núcleo de Excelência em<br>
> Tecnologias Sociais - NEES*<br>
><br>
><br>
> *Desenvolvedor Back-end na Systemic BilingualLattes:<br>
> <<a href="http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552">http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552</a>>http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552<br>
> <<a href="http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552">http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552</a>>*<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> openlp-dev mailing list<br>
> openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
> <a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/679d9362/attachment-0001.html">http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/679d9362/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:48:29 +0100<br>
From: Jonathan Corwin <j@corwin.co.uk><br>
To: OpenLP Developers <openlp-dev@openlp.io><br>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CA+cK5TdYDCcYHjssR0yBb-u5iSGOOp0nOZ=5FbNU+s6Zs=kCkA@mail.gmail.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Yes, OK with me.<br>
<br>
On 10 October 2018 at 16:03, Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev <<br>
openlp-dev@openlp.io> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi folks,<br>
><br>
> We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian has<br>
> been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not had an<br>
> opportunity to actually spend some time on.<br>
><br>
> One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit of<br>
> OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found that while<br>
> OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5) are GPL3.<br>
> Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been contemplating<br>
> investigating it, but I've had other priorities.<br>
><br>
> So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if we<br>
> can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version 3.<br>
> Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to re-license, or a<br>
> "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.<br>
><br>
> Thank you Bastian for your work!<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Raoul Snyman<br>
> +1 (520) 490-9743<br>
> raoul@snyman.info<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> openlp-dev mailing list<br>
> openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
> <a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/a065be96/attachment.html">http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/a065be96/attachment.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
openlp-dev mailing list<br>
openlp-dev@openlp.io<br>
<a href="https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev">https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of openlp-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4<br>
*****************************************<br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>