[openlp-dev] openlp-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4

Nico Opiyo opiyonico at outlook.com
Thu Oct 11 15:41:19 EDT 2018 

Yes
________________________________
From: openlp-dev <openlp-dev-bounces at openlp.io> on behalf of openlp-dev-request at openlp.io <openlp-dev-request at openlp.io>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 4:48:33 PM
To: openlp-dev at openlp.io
Subject: openlp-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4

Send openlp-dev mailing list submissions to
        openlp-dev at openlp.io

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        openlp-dev-request at openlp.io

You can reach the person managing the list at
        openlp-dev-owner at openlp.io

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of openlp-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Philip Ridout)
   2. Re:  Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Samuel Mehrbrodt)
   3. Re:  Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Daniel Borges)
   4. Re:  Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Tim and Alison Bentley)
   5. Re:  Re-license OpenLP to GPL3 (Jonathan Corwin)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 08:18:35 +0100
From: Philip Ridout <phill.ridout at gmail.com>
To: OpenLP Developers <openlp-dev at openlp.io>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3
Message-ID:
        <CAG20JEBzfFswDEdvpPBj-buZMLjL-JShpzArVRPM+PSAoPFqBw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Yes

On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, 08:07 googol, <googol at posteo.de> wrote:

> Okay with me
>
> Am 10.10.18 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian has
> > been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not had an
> > opportunity to actually spend some time on.
> >
> > One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit of
> > OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found that
> > while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5) are GPL3.
> > Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been contemplating
> > investigating it, but I've had other priorities.
> >
> > So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if
> > we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version 3.
> > Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to re-license, or
> > a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.
> >
> > Thank you Bastian for your work!
> >
> _______________________________________________
> openlp-dev mailing list
> openlp-dev at openlp.io
> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/fb8893cc/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:22:20 +0200
From: Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt at gmail.com>
To: openlp-dev at openlp.io
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3
Message-ID: <fd3a4385-6658-7ff1-7ef7-8a42792addc1 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

I agree to re-license my contributions under GPLv3+.

Samuel


Am 10.10.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:
> Hi folks,
>
> We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian
> has been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not
> had an opportunity to actually spend some time on.
>
> One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit
> of OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found
> that while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5)
> are GPL3. Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been
> contemplating investigating it, but I've had other priorities.
>
> So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if
> we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version
> 3. Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to
> re-license, or a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.
>
> Thank you Bastian for your work!
>



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:58:20 -0300
From: Daniel Borges <danielborges93 at gmail.com>
To: OpenLP <openlp-dev at openlp.io>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3
Message-ID:
        <CAGyMjBEtYwGkTJmpLaCorXqLXVZ4RSXVuRwp3qKZSp5_OSYfcQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Ok for me ;-)

What about iOS Remote client? We should re-license to GPL3? Currently we
use MIT license.

Em qui, 11 de out de 2018 às 04:22, Samuel Mehrbrodt <s.mehrbrodt at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> I agree to re-license my contributions under GPLv3+.
>
> Samuel
>
>
> Am 10.10.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian
> > has been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not
> > had an opportunity to actually spend some time on.
> >
> > One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit
> > of OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found
> > that while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5)
> > are GPL3. Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been
> > contemplating investigating it, but I've had other priorities.
> >
> > So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if
> > we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version
> > 3. Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to
> > re-license, or a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.
> >
> > Thank you Bastian for your work!
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> openlp-dev mailing list
> openlp-dev at openlp.io
> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
>


--



*Daniel Borges Ferreira da SilvaBacharel em Ciência da computação pela
UFALMestre em Informática pela UFALMembro do Núcleo de Excelência em
Tecnologias Sociais - NEES*


*Desenvolvedor Back-end na Systemic BilingualLattes:
<http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552>http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552
<http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/f6aeb18d/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:08:54 +0100
From: Tim and Alison Bentley <Home at trarbentley.net>
To: Openlp Dev <openlp-dev at openlp.io>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3
Message-ID:
        <CAAT9HsjT=-=Ye2rO8oYx2pRsjky9UBu9iW-bkGeGKCOUETGbKw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Ios and Android will stay on MIT. This has been agreed with Raoul.

On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, 13:58 Daniel Borges, <danielborges93 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok for me ;-)
>
> What about iOS Remote client? We should re-license to GPL3? Currently we
> use MIT license.
>
> Em qui, 11 de out de 2018 às 04:22, Samuel Mehrbrodt <
> s.mehrbrodt at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> I agree to re-license my contributions under GPLv3+.
>>
>> Samuel
>>
>>
>> Am 10.10.2018 um 17:03 schrieb Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian
>> > has been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not
>> > had an opportunity to actually spend some time on.
>> >
>> > One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit
>> > of OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found
>> > that while OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5)
>> > are GPL3. Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been
>> > contemplating investigating it, but I've had other priorities.
>> >
>> > So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if
>> > we can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version
>> > 3. Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to
>> > re-license, or a "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.
>> >
>> > Thank you Bastian for your work!
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openlp-dev mailing list
>> openlp-dev at openlp.io
>> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> *Daniel Borges Ferreira da SilvaBacharel em Ciência da computação pela
> UFALMestre em Informática pela UFALMembro do Núcleo de Excelência em
> Tecnologias Sociais - NEES*
>
>
> *Desenvolvedor Back-end na Systemic BilingualLattes:
> <http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552>http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552
> <http://lattes.cnpq.br/0755689140229552>*
> _______________________________________________
> openlp-dev mailing list
> openlp-dev at openlp.io
> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/679d9362/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:48:29 +0100
From: Jonathan Corwin <j at corwin.co.uk>
To: OpenLP Developers <openlp-dev at openlp.io>
Subject: Re: [openlp-dev] Re-license OpenLP to GPL3
Message-ID:
        <CA+cK5TdYDCcYHjssR0yBb-u5iSGOOp0nOZ=5FbNU+s6Zs=kCkA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Yes, OK with me.

On 10 October 2018 at 16:03, Raoul Snyman via openlp-dev <
openlp-dev at openlp.io> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> We have a new developer in our community, Bastian. Welcome! Bastian has
> been looking into some things that I've had on my mind, but not had an
> opportunity to actually spend some time on.
>
> One of the things Bastian has been doing recently is a license audit of
> OpenLP and all the libraries we use. In doing so, Bastian found that while
> OpenLP is currently GPL2, some libraries (such as PyQt5) are GPL3.
> Unfortunately, GPL2 and GPL3 are not compatible. I'd been contemplating
> investigating it, but I've had other priorities.
>
> So, I'm going to e-mail all the contributors to OpenLP and ask them if we
> can re-license OpenLP under the GNU General Public License version 3.
> Please reply to that e-mail with a "Yes" if you're OK to re-license, or a
> "No" if you disagree with re-licensing.
>
> Thank you Bastian for your work!
>
> --
> Raoul Snyman
> +1 (520) 490-9743
> raoul at snyman.info
> _______________________________________________
> openlp-dev mailing list
> openlp-dev at openlp.io
> https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/a065be96/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
openlp-dev mailing list
openlp-dev at openlp.io
https://lists.openlp.io/mailman/listinfo/openlp-dev


------------------------------

End of openlp-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 4
*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlp.io/pipermail/openlp-dev/attachments/20181011/79f3ee9e/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the openlp-dev mailing list